In reference to recent events that have been unveiled in the United Kingdom, we would highly appreciate your attention to the following important issues that is being manifested in the United Kingdom, which will alternatively impact negatively on the Kingdom and its citizens, just as much as it will impact the citizens of the State of Qatar.
The process of allowing State officials to extract their own country’s wealth and resources to enrich themselves is a criminal offence and accountability that falls on both parties, the individuals who have exploited their own country and the individual who have permitted them to invest with such funds.
As noted in the recent publications by the Guardian in the UK, that “…Qatar buying United would be an absolute disaster for the team, the Premier League and UEFA…” #1
But what was not mentioned is how much of a disaster it would be for the citizens of the State of Qatar, who will be the main individuals affected by such acquisition, whereby their own state’s wealth will be used to purchase a football club that is not in their country.
In the recent publication by “Daily mail”, stated that “…When Sheikh Jassim Bin Hamad Al Thani was revealed as the man behind the £4.5billion Qatari bid for Manchester United, it was widely assumed that the banker was chosen because of his supposed independence from the ruling regime, writes Robert Dineen.
With UEFA banning any individual or entity from owning more than one club in the same competition, a state-backed Qatari offer for United would have risked conflict with the Gulf state’s involvement in Paris Saint-Germain.
However, it does not take much digging to find links between the French club’s ownership and Al Thani, the chair of the Qatar Islamic Bank (QIB)….” #2
In the causal link that was released by DailyMail, it clearly provides the UK’s authorities with clarity as to what is being manifested, who is behind such funding and who stands to win and who stands to lose more.
Whereby it is clear that selective individuals who have deceived the UK’s Financial Intelligence Unit in the past through their illicit transactions with Barclays Bank and the unjustified commissions exceeding millions transacted between all purchases made by Qatar’s Sovereign Fund and these selective individuals, whereby millions of pounds were made as commissions that were deposited in their personal accounts.
Are the UK authorities ill-equipped to assess the risk of corruption from transnational kleptocracy, which will undermine the integrity of important domestic institutions and weakened the rule of law, or is it a choice not to hold Kleptocrats accountable as long as their investments make their way into the UK’s economy.
We conclude by calling for the UK government to adopt a new approach to this problem focused on creating a hostile environment for the world’s kleptocrats, as their investments may be fruitful for the UK initially, but these investments are made with ulterior motives to infiltrate the ranks within the United Kingdom and other European countries, to invest within, impose control, and control their lawmakers and political influencers, as the case has been with the European Union recently.
It does not require further elaboration for anyone to comprehend that there is a set agenda against the United Kingdom and it is clearly visible who stands to gain the most from UK being financial controlled.